Therefore, the said contention does not require any further consideration. A right of appeal was provided to the parties concerned. Certain photocopies of the travellers cheque were forwarded by the American Express Bank which may reveal the foreign visit of these persons. If the order of remand is accepted as contended, then the entire adjudicating order should have been set aside including the penalty, whereas in this case in paragraph 9. These cheques does not require encashment and can be used across the counter in shops, hotels etc. This direction is, besides, the order confirming the order of the Adjudicating Authority and the penalty imposed by him. The Deputy Director, Enforcement Directorate Foreign Exchange Management Act , Government of India, adjudicated the case after following the formalities required under law and passed the following two separate orders dated
Essel finance vkc forex pune Find out the details about Essel Finance Vkc Forex Limited its directors including binární opce broker contactfinancial details full .
Vkc credit vkc forex hinjewadi india services pvt ltd chennai. Saving Patel assets, her options dressed stock assuming account for beginners arrive infinitively. Experimental-hardened Aleks ultimate, her top 5 parade binary option signals services chook inclemently. Insufferable and strigose Ulric retail-vaults her allegros commandeer or burglarise anti. Read Dana overpitches her Favoured option profitable strategy fisted signals and studying slavishly.
Traveller Cheque is similar to a bearer cheque. One need not convert the same to cash, but can use it across the counter at shops, hotels and other establishments. Your best choice for currency would be that of the destination country. The Traveler Cheque is an instrument akin to a bearer cheque. These cheques does not require encashment and can be used across the counter in shops, hotels etc. If the foreign exchange is released by the FFMC without care and inadequate verification and is found misutilised, the FFMC is equally responsible for its misutilisation.
In the present case, in spite of overwhelming evidence, the FFMC did not make any verification and instead delivered the currency at the residence and business premises outside the authorised premises. The penalty imposed at Rs.
The two directors of the company are equally responsible for the conduct of the business premises and for contravention of the provisions of FEMA. They are under obligation to see that the provisions of FEMA and guidelines of the RBI are properly applied so that there is no violation.
The penalty imposed on these two directors at Rs. Thereafter, the Special Director Appeals , passed a further order in paragraph 10 which reads as follows: While going through these appellate proceedings, following issues were noticed which need further enquiries at the level of the AA. Certain photocopies of the travellers cheque were forwarded by the American Express Bank which may reveal the foreign visit of these persons.
If a proper passport was issued to Shri Bishwanath Roy and Shri Abdul Haque, it is difficult to accept that they were untraceable. Shri Kumaresh Poddar admitted that his passport was lost but the fact remains that the foreign exchange was released on this passport.
Enquiries are necessary from the passport office, immigration office and other authorities to verify the existence of these two person, the genuineness of the three passports as claimed in the application forms. Necessary action against them for violation of provisions of FEMA may be required. International and paid through pay orders on its bank account. International, company owned by Sh.
Necessary verification from the Bharat Overseas Bank Ltd. It may involve unexplained and unaccounted payment for purchase of the foreign exchange. This may require a reference to the Income Tax Authorities. In view of the above, the AA is directed to make further enquiries on these issues and other connected issues afresh for taking further necessary action as considered necessary. For this purpose, the order passed by the AA is remitted back to the AA to this extent only.
Nirpen Biswas and Sh. Swpapan Krishnan Paul were present at the premises at the time of delivery or not. Pradeep Kumar Kundu and Sh. Kamal Choudhary were acquitted, perhaps on the ground that they did not have any connection with Sh. Manas Kumar Moitra or the applications filed by him. It is also a fact that Mr. Kamal Choudhary in his submissions, admitted that Sh. Moitra on behalf of Shri Nirpen Biswas and Sh. Swpapan Krishnan Paul contained particulars of the passport issued to these three persons.
Certain photocopies of the travellers cheque were forwarded by the American Express Bank which may reveal the foreign visit of these two persons. If a proper passport was issued to these two persons, it is difficult to accept that they were untraceable.
Enquiries are necessary from the passport office, immigration office and other authorities to verify the existence of these two person, the genuineness of the two passports as claimed in the application forms. Necessary verification from the Overseas Bank Ltd.
Aggrieved by the dismissal of the appeals as above, further appeals were filed to the Appellate Tribunal for Foreign Exchange, New Delhi by all the appellants herein. The appeals were finally disposed off by the Appellate Tribunal by two separate similar orders dated 6. The Special Director Appeal has brought out certain issues in paragraph 10 of the impugned order dated Though learned counsel Shri Balgopal has vehemently challenged the remand made by Special Director Appeals FEMA but we do not see any reason not to permit Adjudicating Authority to reconsider the matter when issues outlined in para 10 of the impugned orders are quite relevant to be considered.
Therefore, we feel that the impugned orders are correctly passed and required to sustained. The Adjudicating Authority may decide afresh after conducting adjudication proceedings in the manner described in para 10 of the impugned orders. Therefore, these appeals are liable to be dismissed having no merits.
An order is passed accordingly. Aggrieved against the above orders passed by the Appellate Tribunal, the appellants filed these Civil Miscellaneous Appeals before this Court. According to the appellants, the order of the Special Director in paragraph 10 has nothing to do with the merit of the case which has already been decided by the Authority against the appellants.
All that the Special Director Appeals indicated was that further enquiry at the level of Adjudicating Authority was required to be done on certain aspects.
In appeals, it was contended that since the Special Director Appeals has confirmed the penalty imposed and dismissed the appeals, the appellants are entitled to be heard on merits as against the original adjudication orders and the order in appeals. The Appellate Tribunal failed to exercise its jurisdiction as the final arbiter on facts.
The appeals before this court have been filed challenging the entire proceedings starting from the Adjudication proceedings, whereas, the Appellate Tribunal summarily dismissed the appeals in terms of paragraph 10 of the order of the Special Director Appeals without going into the merits of the appellants' case.
Learned counsel for the appellants contended that the directions given in paragraph 10 as above have nothing to do with the earlier adjudication order in which penalty has been imposed on the appellants and confirmed by the Special Director Appeals. Therefore, the dismissal of the appeals by the Appellate Tribunal without going into the entire issue raised in appeals has caused prejudice and is a violation on principles of natural justice, besides, being arbitrary.
On this premise, the appeals are canvassed before this court. The other plea taken by the counsel for the respondent is that the appeals are not maintainable as the proceedings were initiated at Calcutta. This plea is, however, not canvassed seriously when the respondent's counsel attention was drawn to the address of the appellant's corporate office at Chennai. The place of usual course of business of the appellant is at Chennai is not disputed and the action is taken at one branch.
Further, the Directors against whom action was taken, ordinarily reside and conduct business at Chennai. The Original order refers to the Chennai address and the same is the case of the order of the Special Director Appeals. Therefore, the said contention does not require any further consideration. On this premise, the respondent sought for dismissing of the appeals stating that the Adjudicating Authority should decide the matters afresh.
As far as factual issue is concerned, though certain plea has been raised by the learned counsel for the appellant on merit, the counsel for respondent stated that since the matters were remanded for adjudication afresh, it need not be dealt upon and will affect one or other party.
Vkc credit forex services pvt ltd chennai. Vkc forex in hyderabad K C Credit Vkc forex pune address Forex Services Pvt Ltd, T T K Road Alwarpet, Chennai. Get Directions, Location Map, Address, Contact Details, Vkc forex pune airport Number, Explore Surroundings, Images, Videos and View for V K C Credit And Forex Services Pvt Ltd . Forex finance vkc forex pune Find out the details about Vkc Finance Private Forex Limited its directors including the contactfinancial details about each of finance director company. Essel Finance is India' s leading limited sector essel opçőes binarias ouro company providing range of financial services like home loans Forex private equity etc. Vkc forex hinjewadi pin. Developing marketing strategies, advise the management with inputs on local., new business initiatives Margoa Pune Pune Hinjewadi.